Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Watkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Chicago Cubs minor league players. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Logan Watkins

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable minor league baseball player. Strikerforce (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete All the references and external links are for Mike Moustakas, not Logan Watkins. Does not meet notability criteria at WP:BASE/N either from the text in the article (even if we assume references can be found to verify the text) and based on what I can search online. Bagumba (talk) 09:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Removed all references to Mike Moustakas. Not surprisingly, this move left the article completely unreferenced. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to Chicago Cubs minor league players per past precedence. I added the minor league reference page. Spanneraol (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: That would normally be acceptable, except the current article has not cited any sources, and I don't think enough could be found to even justify even a stub in the minor league article. "Please note that such mini-bios should cite reliable sources and conform with Wikipedia policies such as WP:BLP." (WP:BASE/N) Bagumba (talk) 22:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chicago Cubs minor league players per Spanneraol. Alex (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chicago Cubs minor league players. Not enough for a standalone article, young enough that he could potentially be notable in the future. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.