Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logans fire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Logans fire

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book that doesn't even come up in a search engine Maniamin (talk) 04:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Whilst it's not entirely true that the book doesn't appear in search engine results, I can't find anything outside of Amazon.com listings and the like. As such, this is lacking the sources to support notability, so I would recommend Deletion.  one brave  monkey  16:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete pretty much per Onebravemonkey. The book exists, but we don't know much beyond that from reliable sources. Also in case this gets kept there should be an apostrophe in the title; "Logan's".  Them  From  Space  05:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability criteria for books: no non-trivial mentions in independent, reliable sources, no notable awards, author not historically significant etc. Paid particular attention when searching to see if the book was recommended reading at religious schools so it could meet criterion #5, but no luck. Somno (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, would not seem to meet any of the WP:BK notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete, the author seems to be slightly notable (though not having an article yet), but the book sure is not (yet). Also, poorly written and wrong lemma. Deletion Mutation  14:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.