Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogiGear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   -- Cirt (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

LogiGear

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems to fail WP:N. The only real claim of notability that I see is that it was started by people who are claimed to be notable. Not that all notable people have articles on Wikipedia but none of them do and their names are somewhat common which makes finding information about them difficult. Advertising is added regularly by what appear to be SPAs. The only references I can find are small blurbs about something the company is doing or are press releases. Their may be Vietnamese newspapers who have published articles on the company but I can't find any. Ol Yeller Talktome 14:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet another back office tech business, and blatant advertising with typically unconvincing claims of global expertise:  a global software testing company... world-wide services of software testing, test automation, load/performance testing, QA consulting, test education/training, software development, and delivery model... global experts on high-volume test automation and skill-based testing..... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 02:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep to improve. The Book section is quite good as it is already cited by Wiki and other sources. I thought VISTACON information might be interesting audiences; If you think it likes an advertising, just remove VISTACON section. About the "blatant adevertising" LogiGear corporation actually provides these services; just delete the words like "global" "world-wide", the rest of information provided has good references. I am trying to build Outsourcing company in Vietnam | Software testing company in Vietnam NewbieIT (talk) 16:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The face that you're trying to build a company by creating an article here constitutes a conflict of interest. There are several external links to places to purchase books written by employees of the company and that the only references given are press releases which I find to be of an advertising nature and shouldn't be included.  I already removed the external links to Amazon.  If this article is to stay, references need to be added and they need to be from reliable and independent sources (i.e. not press releases).  Ol Yeller  Talktome 02:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just updated the reference from dmoz.org about LogiGear's services. NewbieIT (talk) 02:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Lack of references (in article and on Google News) indicates non-notability. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi all, how about the link from ExtremeTech on Hung Q. Nguyen and his book. BTW; I am newbie; if this article does not satisfy Wiki requirement, I'll move it to my area; just help me to build my first article; I really appreciate that; I intend to build a list of IT companies in Vietnam NewbieIT (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  14:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Update Mr. Hung Q. Nguyen reference: Hung Q. Nguyen in the list of Software Testing experts on Data & Analysis Center for Software website NewbieIT (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 01:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Nothing in the article demonstrates notability.--Talain (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.