Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logi Analytics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Logi Analytics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. References are all routine coverage of press releases in industry press, thus failing WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:AUD. My own searching failed to find anything better. The editing history of the article's original author strongly suggests WP:UPE. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep This company was involved with the NPO Conservation International in a project mapping the rainforest fires this summer, which generated significant coverage:, , , . It's not a great deal, admittedly, but enough to qualify as passing WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Somewhat notable company and meets WP:GNG. Rocktober2018 (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Analyst reports are considered to meet the criteria for establishing notability. Logi Analytics has been covered by Butler, Gartner and Dresner. I have read the Gartner report - I do not have access to the others but in my opinion, this company meets the requirements.  HighKing++ 15:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.