Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logic Nutrition

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete. Rx StrangeLove 18:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Logic Nutrition
Non notable company. Reads like an ad, it is an ad. Rx StrangeLove 17:44, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ad policy violation DV8 2XL 18:16, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Completely unrecoverable spam/ad. Please, let's not contribute to their Google rank by letting this vote run a full 5 days. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  18:51, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * More from the same anon that brought you the spam at New earth homes. Any objections to my pulling the plug?  Discuss amongst yourselves. :) - Lucky 6.9 20:42, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * More power to you, Lucky. &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 20:48:57, 2005-09-01 (UTC)


 * Could go with "attempt to communicate". Kappa 21:22, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Pull the Delete plug, Lucky. Tonywalton | Talk 21:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Gone. Still can't find those doggone templates that box the discussion.  Bear with me, all. - Lucky 6.9 23:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..