Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logic Quest 3D


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Learning Company. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Logic Quest 3D

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NVG - see You're forgiven if you've never heard of Logic Quest 3D. The most activity in the edit history of this non-notable game has been editor tagging and indecision of whether to keep it or delete it.Atsme 📞📧 23:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect Delete - lack of sources makes it fail the WP:GNG. The few sources present are passing mentions or non-notable/non-reliable sources. Tried to boldly redirect it, but was reverted without any real rationale other than "send it to AFD". Sergecross73   msg me  00:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to The Learning Company. If the author is interested in this material, he should expand it there and later WP:SPLIT it out (actually, maybe it would be a good idea to have a list of The Learning Company video games, for any/a bit more detail than can/should be allowed for on the main TLC page?). --Izno (talk) 11:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge per Izno. The game does not meet WP:NVG in its own right, what little content the article has can be moved to the Learning Company page.PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per PohranicniStraze. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.