Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logical dirt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  04:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Logical dirt
Vanity Meteshjj 04:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Not even close to notable, vanity. DarthVad e r 05:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Just look at that entry, non-notable, prank nonsense. Ande B. 06:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete vanity advertisement (with downloading information) B.Wind 07:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * um, whats bad about this i made this game to share with people, and i figured i would share it and write a short documentation of it at the same time theevilovenmit 07:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. It seems like a good game, however the problem is that Wikipedia is only for articles describing people and things of great importance/notability. Unfortunately this game of yours is not quite notable enough for Wikipedia. Please do not take offence from this deletion. You seem to be a civil user and you would make a good editor. Please feel free to help out by contributing to other articles. Have a good day. :-) DarthVad e r 09:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't want to bite newbies, but Wikipedia isn't the place for this. - Motor (talk) 10:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a fun game!  I've been playing it for the past half hour.  The article needs some revision but it's hardly "prank nonsense" as one other user suggested.  At least Move this article to the creator's user page.  Thanks for making a cool game.  Keep designing them and at least post your creations to your user page, if not to actual Wikipedia articles.  172.144.191.214 14:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * User's first post on Wikipedia - their second was, um, interesting. Grutness...wha? 
 * Delete. Not what Wikipedia is for.  I can't believe I bothered to clean up a tiny bit, but I guess that's the Wikipedian in me. Peyna 18:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * feel free to delete i set up a webpage to replace this article,  i'll try making the article when the game is notable by wikipedia standards. theevilovenmit 05:26, 4 June 2006 (GMT -08:00)
 * Thanks for being such a civil and understanding user. I hope that your game becomes notable enough so that it can one day be included on wikipedia. CSD G7. DarthVad e r 00:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is a notable game. I know at least 5 people who play it.  Tobyk777 05:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5 people playing the game is not notable enough. Please provide a source that shows that this article is notable enough for wikipedia standards. DarthVad e r 06:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article name could be WP:DAFTed, too. Grutness...wha?  06:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The cow says mooooooooooooove this to his user page, you crazy party poopers!!!!!1  172.164.26.170 11:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:SOFTWARE doesn't even begin to cover it. Do not userfy, has no bearing on Wikipedia. Sandstein 19:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, "Do not userfy"? You mean this poor kid can't even talk about his own software on his own damn user page?  Who are you, anyway, freakin' HITLER??? 172.128.23.117 20:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh... Godwin's Law strikes again! Grutness...wha?  00:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.