Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech G35


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Logitech G series. v/r - TP 02:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Logitech G35

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * keep  At worst, easily mergeable into an article on the line of these products from a major manufacturer.  But this is an important recent product , and there seem to  be substantial reviews, which would make it independently notable. I consider the practice of nominating for deletion equally and indiscriminately major product article with source, and minor ones with poor sourcing, to be unhelpful.   DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Sources are provided and it meets the general notability guideline, it simply needs work. How about doing some real article writing instead of just jumping to delete? Steven Walling &bull; talk   22:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable product. Most of the review sites appear to be offering the thing for sale, making them non-independent. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Logitech G series. That's enough coverage; Wikipedia doesn't need this enormous mass of uncited technical detail. I see that dozens of other products within that series also have their own Wikipedia articles, and I suspect they could all be boldly redirected to the G series article with a net improvement to Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.