Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitravel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 04:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Logitravel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Not notable and appears to be promotional.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * That article is not intended to be promotional. The creator of that article (Denis Arnaud, me) is not, in any way, employed by, or affiliated to, Logitravel. I searched on the Web for primary sources, but could not find any better ones than the Web site or social network profiles. -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


 * speedy delete: no indication of importance. ubiquity (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. If the article's creator couldn't find anything other than the company's website and social media for sources, it is clearly not notable. YSSYguy (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.