Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logo Board Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Logo Board Game

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable board game. I have not been able to find any significant, direct, detailed coverage of this topic in secondary sources. The PROD-tag was removed without explanation by – which seems rather impolite but no more so than I've come to expect. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  belonger  ─╢ 18:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Has won awards as a game of the year in multiple countries such as France. Warden (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And those awards are notable how? Are they awarded by notable groups? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please state which notability guideline provides that games that have won minor awards are considered notable. It must have SIGNIFICANT COVERAGE. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  sheriff  ─╢ 21:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - This is a moderately successful board game from the U.K., which also had a French edition. Not too big in the USA, as far as I can tell. But this encyclopedia is not USA-centric, so the UK notability is sufficient.  --Noleander (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - The Board game has gotten some coverage:
 * this article and giveaway from The Western Telegraph
 * This similar, but different article and giveaway from Liverpool Echo
 * this review from Bizzie Babies, but just the top part as the bottom includes reviews from users of the website.
 * A few brief sentences about the game in yet another giveaway
 * Not sure if these sources are moot because many of them are giveaways, but they do provide some coverage. The coverage is, however, not ideal.  Coupled with the award though, however minor, I'm willing to keep this one. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 03:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Top-selling game in the UK in 2009, awarded the Grand Prix du Jouet - this easily makes it notable. StAnselm (talk) 08:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per StAnselm. Edward321 (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.