Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logo of Wikipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Not a snowball's chance even if the nomination rationaile was valid. The Bushranger One ping only 01:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Logo of Wikipedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The topic is already covered at Wikipedia logos, what's the point of having this article anyway if it is already covered in the project namespace ''TheChampionMan1234 23:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia logos is not the encyclopedia. The question is whether the logo is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article. I'm inclined to say that it is. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  00:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG per:
 * The New York Times article
 * NPR article
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 04:07, 14 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Existence of something in the Wikipedia namespace does not mean there is duplication. Ryan Vesey 14:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Article fully complies with all or any relevant criteria, including WP:GNG. Article is not  a duplication  of a mainspace page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Meets WP:GNG.  Zappa  O  Mati   20:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.