Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogosQuiz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. AfC draft already in existence can continue to be improve, and eventually moved over this title if/once it is accepted after review. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  12:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

LogosQuiz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Copied from an early version of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LogosQuiz which is still under review at AFC. The version at AFC is not ready for the main encyclopedia either. The topic may or may not be notable but both this version and the more-complete article at AFC are way too promotional in tone for the main encyclopedia. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 19:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced – and as per YouTube views, I doubt we would count downloads as showing notability. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  14:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator I declined the version at AFC, but if it is improved and notability adequately demonstrated, it may be moved into the main article space. If it is not, then it is better to have no article than either this or the now-declined AFC submission. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  15:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.