Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logos Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Logos Group

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Longstanding "marketing" for a translation business; which is one of many translation businesses. I was able to find a mention of the subject (as a line item, one of many) in an industry trade journal. There is nothing I can find that speaks to notability. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 03:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all hits are for a transportation company with the same name. Oaktree b (talk) 03:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete strike duplicate !vote agreed, found the same Flibbertigibbets (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of substantial coverage in independent RS found. However, Flib is not allowed to vote twice. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I voted twice - because that is what you do in America! "vote for who you want and vote often" No I voted twice because I did not realize I voted twice.. Now I know that if you nominate an article for deletion (this is my second nomination)  that implies a delete! which would make sense.  BTW I am current eating cereal and stuffing ballot boxes as we speak.That makes me a serial ballot box stuffer for sure.Flibbertigibbets (talk) 13:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An unreferenced article on a company; searches find the usual social media (their Linkedin page claims they are a "Global Language Service Provider for businesses ready to concur the world") and occasional listings relative to their Logos Dictionary (which is both the topic of much of this article's content and another unreferenced article; I don't see a redirect to there as a suitable WP:ATD). Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for posting the "WP:"Standards" there is quite a bit to learn! Flibbertigibbets (talk) 13:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks any WP:INDEPENDENT sources and not also fails WP:N Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.