Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loh Teo Kwong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 02:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Loh Teo Kwong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:MANOTE and lacks the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG. A high rank is not enough to show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 17:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

 *Keep: The fact that he is the youngest person (and first non-Korean) to receive a 9th dan and as a twice European champion from the WTF certainly seems to indicate some degree of notability. Might as well go delete since I can't find anymore sources. YoungIreland (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above points, properly referenced, should be added to the article.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, have added another neutral reference relating to him being the first non-Korean. YoungIreland(talk) 22:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * How about one for twice European champion.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting a neutral source on that will be a bit more difficult and will take time. YoungIreland(talk) 22:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Even without references I would put that information along with the years into the article.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Done.YoungIreland(talk) 22:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The claim of winning back to back European titles needs to be sourced or removed. I have some issues with the sources currently in the article because they aren't enough to meet WP:GNG and his rank is irrelevant for notability purposes.  Here are my comments on the 6 sources:
 * 1. He's not mentioned on the web page that's linked to.
 * 2. Passing mention as running his organization's tournament.
 * 3. His bio at his club's website.
 * 4. Passing mention that he visited a particular club.
 * 5. Blog where anyone can post.
 * 6. Brief interview with local paper. Papaursa (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails MANOTE and sources aren't enough to meet GNG.204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

 * Keep There are good sources. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC) I'll just go for delete then if there are no good reliable sources. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Would you please tell me what those good sources are? The ones mentioned in the article certainly don't qualify as significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a lack of significant coverage and there's nothing to support claims of back-to-back European championships. If he did win some titles in 1979 and 1980, they weren't from the WTF.  The WTF didn't hold a European championship in 1979 and he's not even listed as a medalist in the 1980 results . Papaursa (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete European Champion twice in 1979 and 1980: would be notable but there are no reliable references. jmcw (talk) 15:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Jmcw37--fails GNG and MANOTE.Mdtemp (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.