Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lohum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Lohum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

previously deleted and moved into draft. Draft:Lohum Cleantech. Advertisement of Lohum. GregChi (talk) 03:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. GregChi (talk) 03:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Per, WP:RSP, I did an analysis on the sources used in this article, ignoring those NOT on the list.
 * Forbes (Reliable source)
 * The Times of India (Situational source)
 * Financial Times (Reliable source)
 * These sources are a minority, not counting duplicates. The rest of the sources do not count to notability. It is kind of written like an advertisement, but we can always WP:BLOWITUP if it passes notability. (I have some end crystals and obsidian in my offhand, don’t mind the Minecraft reference.) But given a google search on the article, there is not much reliable sources so I’d say delete it. Ping me if any reliable sources (aside from the ones on the article) are found.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 03:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have erased several subsections on the firm's products, as these were promotionally worded ("easy-to-integrate into your systems for seamless value discovery", etc.), but they are here if anyone wants to review them for this AfD. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  14:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: The information in the draftified version gives a clearer summary of this battery recycling start-up in various respects. However, sticking to the question of notability, despite all the chaff of partnership announcement references in this instance, there are several substantial pieces about the company (Forbes India 22/3/21, Business India 13/12/21, Times of India 10/3/23), possibly sufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, are you seeing some "Independent Content" any some of those? Which ones? I'm just seeing stuff based on interviews and regurgitated company info. What am I missing?  HighKing++ 12:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Maybe I'm missing something, lets see if anyone can point to something I might have missed but for now, I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 12:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.