Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loi Mistica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - nothing notable just some guy trying to promote himself. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Loi Mistica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hoax. Lacks notability. Full of made up shit. Claims lots of charting and certifications but Billboard comes up empty. Claims albums released by Sony but there is no verification from anywhere but his own site. Everything is sourced to his own site. More fantasy on his other pages. Beautiful In My Eyes (Loi Mistica song) charted in 6 countries? UK. Rubbish. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Also including most of his other articles.
 * (Right Here Waiting (Loi Mistica album) is already at afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (Right Here Waiting (Loi Mistica album) is already at afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (Right Here Waiting (Loi Mistica album) is already at afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (Right Here Waiting (Loi Mistica album) is already at afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (Right Here Waiting (Loi Mistica album) is already at afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: Note that the author of Loi Mistica had attempted to blank the page. ... disco spinster   talk  14:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all for failing WP:V. Notability claims cannot be supported by reliable sources. Searches get only user-generated content sites. This is an elaborate walled garden of unverifiable (and some outright false) information. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all Nothing notable there just some guy trying to promote himself. Koala15 (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all speedily - Per CSD:G3, these are confirmed hoaxes. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.