Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lois Ann Fairley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Lois Ann Fairley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While this person seems to have had a role in forming a regional nursing association, I'm not sure that meets our notability threshold. Others may disagree. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - The person is notable sir. As what you have said, she had a role in a regional nursing association. She is notable for most of her works sir in the Canadian society, to the Ontario society to be exact. An award was also named after her for enormous contributions to patient care and nurses rights. For me, she is notable and that is backed up by credible and notable references. Though quite few, I think those are enough to merit her notability.-- A R E N Z O Y 1 6 A • t a l k • 18:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - just wanted to note that there was an obituary in the Windsor Star 20 July 2007, NEWS p.A3 - I didn't see that reference in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsenseferret (talk • contribs) 21:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep-- This nomination lapses from the advice of WP:BEFORE. I added the following references, from 1974, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1985 -- which show that Fairley was a notable leader, whose comments were regularly sought.  I am always profoundly disturbed when a nominator drafts a vague nomination like this one -- where a red-linked talk page shows they made zero effort to use the talk page to express their concern.  Nominations, like this one, which are vague, and don't cite a specific policy, lapse from the widely accepted advice of WP:IDONTLIKEIT.  It would have been far better if the nominator simply voiced their concern on the talk page. Geo Swan (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * just to clarify, are you claiming that this falls within "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." under WP:BIO nonsense  ferret  14:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Geo Swan, I think it has long been agreed that a person is not notable for merely appearing in the press when part of their role is to act as a spokesperson. That said, I don't put much effort into looking for sources when dealing with paid editors. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nonsense-ferret, Ms Fairley was one of the founders of, and as an early president of, an important union. Am I asserting Ms Fairley's years as founder of and President of an important union -- combined with having an annual prize named after her, are sufficient to establish notability?  Yes.  Geo Swan (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just curious as to which of the WP guidelines you were using - WP:PEOPLE? nonsense  ferret  01:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * just to clarify, are you claiming that this falls within "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." under WP:BIO nonsense  ferret  14:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Geo Swan, I think it has long been agreed that a person is not notable for merely appearing in the press when part of their role is to act as a spokesperson. That said, I don't put much effort into looking for sources when dealing with paid editors. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nonsense-ferret, Ms Fairley was one of the founders of, and as an early president of, an important union. Am I asserting Ms Fairley's years as founder of and President of an important union -- combined with having an annual prize named after her, are sufficient to establish notability?  Yes.  Geo Swan (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just curious as to which of the WP guidelines you were using - WP:PEOPLE? nonsense  ferret  01:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just curious as to which of the WP guidelines you were using - WP:PEOPLE? nonsense  ferret  01:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sufficient coverage to meet our notability guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.