Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lois Shade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Lois Shade

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable public figure who does not pass WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Anton.bersh (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Comment There are two LA Times articles which features her prominently but their main thrust are about the City Manager's hiring, then firing. These meets independent, reliable, but fails significant. Also found a an article naming her as a candidate along with a few other people. So again, not significant. Nweil (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Glendora is not a large or significant enough city to secure the "inherent" notability of its mayors just for existing as mayors per se — so the notability test she would have to pass is not the ability to minimally verify that she existed, but the ability to write and source a substantial article about her political significance. Specific projects she spearheaded, specific effects she had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But that's not what this article is. Bearcat (talk) 01:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.