Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loizos Papasavva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Loizos Papasavva

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

With only 106 mins of professional football, Papasavva has, at best, a weak presumption of notability here. I am aware that he played two cup games but these were while playing for a club in the 2014–15 Cypriot Second Division, so don't count towards notability. Zero coverage found in Google News and only Wikipedia mirrors found in a Greek language search. The massive WP:GNG failure means that I recommend deletion here as clearly this sportsperson isn't notable enough to warrant an article in a global encyclopaedia. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per GS. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject appears to lack WP:SIGCOV and as such doesn't warrant a standalone article. GauchoDude (talk) 15:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.