Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lok Paritran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. --Fang Aili talk 17:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Lok Paritran

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly non-notable... you decide. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 04:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 
 * Weak Keep Google news search shows a few recent articles, one of which claims 20,000 members, which seems notable for a two year old party. The reason I say "weak" is that I'm not 100% convinced of the veracity of all this.  Citi Cat   ♫ 05:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Krakatoa  Katie  10:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Very Weak Keep - Hovering on the brink, I'm going to err on the side of caution and assume good faith that the single source (The Times of India) is a reliable source. /Blaxthos 11:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Interesting note - As noted on the Main Page, The Times of India was founded today (3 November) in 1838. /Blaxthos 12:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I've made a fast control, and it is talked of by another well known Indian paper, The Hindu. The party has fielded candidates, and seems to have a national organization. Just by The Hindu, the party obtains mention in 43 articles, having obtained surprisingly good results in the Tamil Nadu elections in 2006. --Aldux 17:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is quite notable. Plenty of non-trivial mentions in secondary sources are available. The article just needs some references. utcursch | talk 15:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.