Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Panda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Lola Panda

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Well this is...certainly a very questionable article with no clear redirect target. A before doesn't inspire any confidence either.

Unless I'm missing something this is pretty much open and shut not notable? Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing indicates why this deserves an article. Fails WP:N. Jontesta (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note The Finnish WP article doesn't look too bad, but notability is still vague. Translation of relevant (sourced) bits: [...] The games are particularly popular in China and the United States, with Finland being a marginal market.[1] The games have voice control in dozens of languages.[2] BeiZ was founded in China in 2010.[3] The company was acquired by Finnish ownership two years later.[4] At the time, entertainment game makers such as Rovio, Supercell, Remedy, Bugbear and Fingersoft were considered the cornerstones of the Finnish game industry.[5][2] Lola Panda educational games have been successful internationally, especially in China, without the publicity of the more well-known game houses.[6] Lola Panda teaches children under school age to learn various skills.[6] – sgeureka t•c 09:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * What sources are those citing to? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't speak Finnish, therefore I don't know how well-regarded/reliable they are. – sgeureka t•c 08:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Though not failing WP:WEBCRIT, most of the coverage was received in 2012-2013, which leads me to a conclusion that the coverage was ‘’’sensational’’’ Vorann Gencov (talk) 09:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.