Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolaracoaster

Lolaracoaster was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

The name of the page is misspelled, the article is full of nonsense slang I've never heard of, and it actually has no Alexa rating! Luigi30 12:00, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Lolarcoaster is now on Wikipedia. 
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/lolarcoaster
 * Feel free to add your own content (catchphrases and shit) but don't add crap like "lol digi is a niggaz"
 * This article is a reposting of Lolarcoaster, which is already on VfD. - Mike Rosoft 22:41, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete.  - Vague | Rant 12:04, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory! We do not need an article for every insignificant message board on the Internet. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 13:31, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete and possibly speedy delete, but especially to block contributor for vandalism. Geogre 16:43, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Vanity. Delete. - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler  [ flame ]  ]] 18:41, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Jayjg 20:47, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Reposting of a spam article. Not notable - advertised website doesn't even have an Alexa rank. A candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 22:41, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. DCEdwards1966 04:51, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.