Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolarcoaster (0th nomination)

Lolarcoaster was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Non-notable website (and the less said about their catchphrases the better). gK [[User talk:GK|&iquest;?]] 10:54, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Article should get deleted, creator should get a lobotomy. Wyllium 11:15, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
 * Spam, not notable. (Does not even have an Alexa rank.) Delete. - Mike Rosoft 12:42, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, Lobotomise --fvw* 13:19, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
 * I now know how John Howard stays in office. Delete, lobotomise, sterilise etc. Alphax (talk) 14:17, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability, or lobotomobility. But I'd rather have a bottle in frontomy than a frontal lobotomy anyday. Andrewa 14:25, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Further proof that the AOLHellions are slowly taking over the internet. Arcuras 18:17, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete it. I'm not even getting a response from lolarcoaster.com. Oky bibuy. Donutz 18:23, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Reading this was the functional equivalent of a lobotomy, I think. Geogre 00:56, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - Drstuey 06:33, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Non-notable website, non-notable catchphrases. Delete Ashibaka tlk 19:27, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.