Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolifox 2nd attempt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 02:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Lolifox

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A fork of Mozilla Firefox with no evidence of notability presented. A Google search showed quite a few hits, but I didn't see any secondary sources (such as reviews); aside from the software's homepage itself, most of the links were just mirrors. Since the article has no references, this fails WP:V and WP:RS. The result of a previous AFD was to delete, but there is no evidence that this is a re-creation rather than a new article under the same title, so marking for speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. NOTE: If the consensus is to delete, then the corresponding fair-use image should also be deleted by the closing admin. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 18:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. HornandsoccerTalk 04:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe you're right, but lolifox is still a legitimate branch of Firefox. Altmit Development is a real company/sole proprietorship, currently designing AGE (Altimit Game Engine) and DesktopIconStyle as well as lolifox. If Altimit really is creating their own software, then their other products might be added to Wikipedia as well...

Primetech 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. It's not even worth a merge to the main Firefox article. YechielMan 14:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. . Mukadderat 17:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.