Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolipop lagelu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Lolipop lagelu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONG. Sheldybett (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: if not deleted move to Lolipop Lagelu as per text. Pam  D  06:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose : this very famous song and cult supposedly, so don't delete  MrZINE 11:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Editor indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. Richard3120 (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please note that your comment to oppose may be dismissed as it falls under WP:ILIKEIT. Personal preference is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article or other content. Horizonlove (talk) 09:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep (Article author):- This is an internationally famous song, so don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NIA3000 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)  — Note to closing admin: NIA3000 (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Richard3120 (talk) 13:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please note that your comment to oppose may be dismissed as it falls under WP:ILIKEIT. Personal preference is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article or other content. Horizonlove (talk) 09:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: It fails WP:NSONG. There are no sources to support any of the claims on the song's page. Not only that, but the grammar in this article is a little mediocre. "The melodious version of the song was sung by Siddharth Slathia along with the collaboration of American Violin player". Why not simply say "The song was covered by...." If not a delete, then most definitely a redirect. Horizonlove (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete since subject fails WP:NSONG. -The Gnome (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 *  Oppose  : WP:Songs says that, songs should be covered by several Artists, Bands or groups, the this song is also published by many Singers, bands and also used in several movies and version in other languages are also present. For every point there is given some reference to prove the point.In other words it should be added on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NIA3000 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * . You have already cast your !vote above, striking out your second vote. Britishfinance (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NSONG. Britishfinance (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.