Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombardi gras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Lombardi gras

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:ILIKEIT, but it's a non-notable neologism. May even be eligible for speedy. THF (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I would have CSDed it in the beginning if I could have found a category to put it in. Since when does Facebook count as a source? Isn't this basically a fan page for a house party? I vote delete. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above. Verbal chat  08:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's definitely no speedy criterion that would apply, and it may astonish you to learn that this term appears in, among other places, the Los Angeles Times, although in a different sense than is meant here.  Still, the content of this article is WP:MADEUP, and the whole thing is a WP:NEOLOGISM concerning something that is merely WP:INTHENEWS.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 09:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't surprise me at all. It's a natural pun on Mardi Gras. THF (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, in fact Speedy delete if possible. This is borderline for a speedy delete as promotional: it certaionly serves no other purpose that I can see. Certainly no evidence of notability. (The Facebook page referred to above was given not as a source but as a promotional link. It was unacceptable under at least 3 of the provisions of WP:ELNO.) JamesBWatson (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable party.  Anna Lincoln  11:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete anyone? Fairly obvious this isn't going to be kept...Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep it! It's history in the making. The people's history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.9.73 (talk) 03:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, I am a Saints Fan, but this is not only not written in Wikipedia Standards, its just not that big of an event to have its' own page. I would like for it to be merged and rewritten to the New Orleans Saints page, marking an event that happens when the Saints win a Superbowl, as short or as long as it may happen again. Nicknyte (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.