Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombardia Autonoma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Many questionable !votes from new accounts muddy the consensus. BJ Talk 03:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Lombardia Autonoma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

New politic party without notability, nor any representation. See also, AfD in it.wiki Invitamia (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * On it.wiki, +1 is a vote to delete and -1 is a vote to keep, for those who follow the link.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 14:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, as there is no notability for this that I can find, particularly for the English speaking world, but also on the whole.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 14:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * allow me to spell it out further. This is a brand new political party that has run in two city elections in Italy and received less than 1/2 of 1% of the vote in each. I personally have participated in the creation of political parties in the Buffalo NY area that run for election in a city once or twice and receive many times that vote, and I would never dream of creating a Wikipedia page for the Integrity Party or the Sardinia First Party.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 14:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. The party has some clout in Italy and its leader gained many votes in list with the Pole of Autonomy in the last European Parliament election in Lombardy. As it.Wiki is almost an unreliable source, I don't see how a deletion there can be a reason for deleting an article in en.Wiki. The party is notable and it is useful to understand the various splits of Lega Nord. --Checco (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Just one like hundreds of splinter parties in Italian history. Nobody knows how many months longer it will exist. --Invitamia (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. It contested an election, that is grounds enough for notability. — Nightstallion 15:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Pointers to significant independent coverage by recognized, serious and reliable sources would help one decide. Ian Spackman (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Next year it will be present to the Lombardy regional elections, what will we do then? Obviously reopen this page. So at this point we can already leave the page. --Stefand (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. --Lumage (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a young political movement, but expressing new ideas coming from the Lombard society. It will be present to the next regional general elections and thus it shall be menetioned again in the close future. Moreover deleting political parties does not respect the freedom of expressions in my opinion. --Tbusato (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has presented a list for Milan city council, and it's part of Pole of Autonomy that contested last European elections in Italy.--79.35.129.214 (talk) 08:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Where are the reliable sources for this? I'll change my !vote if sources come up, but I'm just not seeing any. Tavix | Talk  02:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.