Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London - Game of children


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. Jayjg (talk) 03:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

London - Game of children

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

These are four supposed children's games from India for which no sources are given and for which I can find none. My PRODs were removed without comment by the author, who has also declined to answer my inquiry on his talk page about sourcing. I realize one should expect it to be hard to find sources about backyard games in India, but unfortunately we need to have them.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 07:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 10:21, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: all four games are regional variants and might be known by different names in different states. I have known (by other names) and played three of them myself. But reliable sources would be difficult to find. I think number of phd thesis exist for such games. But unpublished dissertations won't meet RS standards. Will have to look for regional language books.--Sodabottle (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge all three into an article called Traditional Indian children's games. We have an entire Category:Children's games that would be more accurately called "Games that Wikipedians played while growing up in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada or Australia".  However, there does need to be sourcing regarding the existence of these games.  An article based on one's childhood memories is only original research. Mandsford (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are better known games that aren't notable enough to have their own articles. EeepEeep (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pmlineditor   ∞  10:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete delete them all! Per nom andyzweb (talk) 06:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I'd like to pre-emptively quash any unfair claims of WP:BIAS -- if you have sources, show them.  Put up or shut up.  JBsupreme (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No possible way to verify. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per Mansford. Title says it all. Merge seems like a good idea Buggie111 (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.