Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 225


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of bus routes in London. Cirt (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

London Buses route 225

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable bus route, have previously redirected this to List of bus routes in London as an alternative to deletion, but the original author keeps reverting this. Yes there are other route articles in existence, but most of which scrape some sort of notability, yet his one does not. Delete Jenuk1985  |  Talk  16:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect it back to the list, and ask the creator not to revert it with the 3-strike rule.  Lugnuts  (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- owing to the lack of content, information would be better placed as a note in the bsu routes article. HJ Mitchell (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Lugnuts ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * REdirect and protect against expansion We do not need articles on bus routes. They are liable to change at frequent intervals and with little notice.  Their articles are therefore essentially unmaintainable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The London Buses articles are generally well written and maintained. However, this one is way too basic and has no notability. I would say redirect, but that is disastrous as in the list it appears as though an article is there when it isn't. A red link is better. Arriva436talk/contribs 15:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If the article is redirected, the link could be removed from the list page and any "see also" sections or templates. Leaving a red link would suggest that the article should be created again. — Snigbrook  23:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Peterkingiron above. We have articles on individual train lines because they tend not to change much; we are not a directory of bus routes and there's nothing particularly noteworthy about this one; the only pertinent facts are the destinations, the operating company and the type of bus used, both of which would be more appropriate as part of a list. –  iride scent   18:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Lugnuts  Chzz  ►  23:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.