Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 390


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

London Buses route 390

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability beyond a passing mention in a couple of news articles, about service changes, not really "significant coverage" Jeni  ( talk ) 12:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no need for a separate article about every single bus route in existence. User: Sheepythemouse —Preceding undated comment added 15:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As noted above not every bus route in london needs an article .... We already have List of bus routes in London which is more than sufficient. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like there is some coverage of this route's history and significance in the Blacker source listed in the article, but I don't think this topic has received enough coverage in secondary sources to pass WP:GNG]. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete—not every bus route merits an article, and this one at this time does not.  Imzadi 1979  →  22:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nordic   Dragon  20:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the list article. There doesn't at present appear to be sufficient coverage to support an article, but as there is some coverage it's not impossible that more will exist in the future, the content isn't problematic and could form part of a notable article so I strongly prefer redirection rather than straight deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 21:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I think that transport-related routes only deserve an article if they're notable in some way other than just being a bus route - and this one does not. — Omni Flames  ( talk   contribs ) 08:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.