Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Fog (beverage)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Transwiki'd to wikibooks. John Vandenberg (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

London Fog (beverage)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally unsourced and probably non-notable; badly-toned. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 19:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure about the validity of "badly-toned" as a deletion rationale, but the article is certainly unsourced and non-notable.  Happy‑melon 20:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The information is in the main easy to verify without references. The article is, however, largely a recipe and would be better placed in Wikibooks. The beverage doesn't appear to have sufficient significance to make a clear case for an encyclopedia article.--Michig (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Copy to the wikibooks cookbook. Think outside the box 14:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikify to cookbooks. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 21:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikify. I agree with the two above me that this article probably does not meet our notability standards but that it is an appropriate topic for wikibooks' cookbooks. SorryGuy Talk  01:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.