Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Super Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Kurykh  21:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

London Super Tower

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've nominated this for deletion as it reads kinda like a promotional piece of work. When I tried to find out more about this on Google most links were blogspam or social news linking to them, bar this article and the architects concept page. Indeed the first link states "This building is not likely to be built and the design is more an exercise of architectural imagination." As such, I'm unsure that it deserves an article so thought I'd put it to consensus.Raerth (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The tower is a proposal.   Rejectwater (talk) 22:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:29, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there are notable unbuilt skyscrapers (e.g. The Illinois), this does not appear to be one of them. It's not even a proposal so much as a concept or a parlor game. --Dhartung | Talk 23:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.