Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia/2nd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep WP:POINT. kingboyk 23:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

London Underground trivia
Trivia articles--Td6c 17:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - we had this discussion just 4 months ago. Bob schwartz 17:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - survived before and will survive again. Anyway, this is useful for knowing extra information about the LU. Besides there are lots of other trivia pages. Most people will argue that trivia information is at least interesting. Simply south 17:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Relevant trivia can go into the articles they are about, no need to have a page just for trivia. TJ Spyke 20:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - we've been through this once before. The London Underground article is far too large as it is - there is absolutely no way anything more should have to be added to it.  Nonetheless, the information in this article is exactly the kind of thing people look for when they consult Wikipedia - it is the kind of factual information that forms the reason why Wikipedia is different to other encyclopaediae.  The reason this page exists is not to have "a page just for trivia", but to rationalise the size of the main article.   DJR  ( T ) 20:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - the user account that created this AfD only seems to exist for the purpose of submitting AfDs, and of the four that have been submitted, consensus thus far has been keep. --Dennisthe2 21:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.