Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Vale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Does not meet WP:BASIC joe deckertalk to me 16:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

London Vale

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

My PROD has been challenged by the subject. My rationale for the PROD was "Fails WP:BASIC - can't find any significant coverage regarding her as a model. Only RS on page does not address the subject directly. (Source only discusses "London Sponsel" too...)" I don't think anything has changed since. SmartSE (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Seems to be notable; however minor of a "celebrity" this person is.   LogicalCreator (talk) 12:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * DeleteIt appears she's been in some shorts or ultra-low-budget films that never made it to wide release. In other words, she appears to be only marginally more successful than the million waiter/actors in L.A. (Sorry, not trying to be mean, and it's not hard to imagine her making it big someday, but she hasn't made it yet...)JoelWhy (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I cannot find any news stories about her, only one passing mention about a film. So I think it will not be possible to show notability.  But there are heaps of different social websites with the name on them, a sign that Wikipedia has been counted as a social website as well. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete references include Facebook, IMDB, and an rs article saying she inherited an apple orchard. She was "Miss Tarzana" according to the Miss California USA website but nothing notable.   Wikipelli Talk   13:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing that would make her pass WP:BIO. SL93 (talk) 23:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable bit-part performer; no more notable than many thousands of other SAG/AFTRA members. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.