Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonely (fashion label)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two relistings, the consensus leans towards keep, but not by much. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 17:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Lonely (fashion label)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure the article should have been approved in the first place but have come across it now that the owners are in the news. Don't believe the Company/Fashion Label meets WP:COMPANY and doesn't have enough for WP:GNG. Page didn't have a lot on it and now has section that is all about the crazy owners, which even if it is decided as keep, I am going to thin out. NZFC (talk) (cont)  08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  NZFC  (talk) (cont)  08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  NZFC  (talk) (cont)  08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  NZFC  (talk) (cont)  08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  NZFC  (talk) <sup style="color:black">(cont)  08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Per nom. The Forbes piece is written by a contributor.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It was an early brand featuring diverse models, which added to discussions around this issue. It continues to be a brand that prompts coverage about textiles ethics. I have expanded the page. SunnyBoi (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep  there is significant coverage. Passes notability wp:GNG. Coverage in The Guardian and Elle are from credible publications. Peter303x (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage seems adequate to me to pass WP:GNG. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.