Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long-distance pregnancy

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 17:25, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Long-distance pregnancy
Tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "Unless we have sources of these stories being true, it reads as patent nonsense to me". It doesn't fit the definition of patent nonsense, but does look like it might be original research. Kappa 21:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ok, maybe I screwed up on the speedy deletion stuff, but I still stand by my original statement. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 21:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a candidate for speedy, but it seems like original research. -- MicahMN | Talk 22:17, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless anecdotes are documented. What's the name of that movie where a woman is raped and impregnated by a computer?  Zoe 23:26, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Demon Seed Uncle G 04:19:43, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
 * Ah. Thanks, Unc.  Zoe 18:11, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.