Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long-short (romanization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Long-short (romanization)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced for a long time and of questionable notability. Deleted in 2017 with a WP:PROD by me; WP:REFUNDed recently with the single-word argument of "notable", but I disagree with this greatly per Talk:Long-short_(romanization). Suzukaze-c (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete : This is original work, unsourced too, about a subject supposedly notable. Well, even if it were so, Wikipedia is not a journal for essays. -The Gnome (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * delete. Long and short vowels is not particular to Wu dialects, it occurs in Yue, i.e. Cantonese and similarly long vowels are just doubled, as well as in many other languages. So it seems a stretch to say a Romanisation system would be based on it. The only place I’ve found anything links back to WP: to this old version of Wu Chinese. That too was unsourced though, and was removed in the next revision 11 years ago. Also seems it was referred to here: fr:Discussion:Shanghaïen – the 'Chicago' column.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 16:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.