Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Branch (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Long Branch (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a short film, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NFO. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists, and instead must show some evidence of significance (notable film awards, critical analysis by professional film critics in real media, etc.) -- but the only notability claim on offer here is that the film exists, and the sourcing isn't getting it over WP:GNG: one footnote is the film's own distributor, one is a deadlinked Q&A interview with the filmmakers from an unreliable blog and one is a review in a minor film magazine, meaning that two of the three sources are not support for notability at all, and the third is a start but does not get to the finish line all by itself if it's the strongest source on offer. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this short film from having to have more than just one hit of media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.