Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longdendale Community Language College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, nominator has withdrawn nomination/no longer advocates deletion, and no other participants advocate deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Longdendale Community Language College

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails to meet any notability standards under WP:ORG, other than being inspected and having a small award with limited coverage based on a google search. Kind of borderline to me, but I am on the delete side for this one. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 18:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Sasquatch  t&#0124;c 18:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Sasquatch  t&#0124;c 18:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I agree that it's on the borderline. The general presumption is that schools are notable; if there's really not enough for an article about the school, what can be salvaged should be merged into the next layer up (local council article?), and this page turned into a redirect to that article. —C.Fred (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I would be up for a merge... Please note that it is not a high school, which is where it gets a bit sketchy to me. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 19:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is a longstanding convention that schools for pupils over about 11–12 years old are notable.  Mr Stephen (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. it is a secondary school and it also has a large amount of information compared to other schools example ALDER Jacobga (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.