Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest note on a woodwind/brass instrument


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Woodwind. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Longest note on a woodwind/brass instrument
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not the Guinness book of world records Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Woodwind Jenuk1985  |  Talk  20:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to merge, trivial. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Worth a mention I think. Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I prefer to preserve as much content as possible, but there's no place for this in the Woodwind instrument article. Fences and windows (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I was getting ready to change my vote per your investigation... but there's nothing BUT room in the Woodwind instrument article. It needs to be expanded and the longest note seems like a fun start. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom, not seen that reason before, and it's clearly not notable for its own article. Teeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. New Record! Bigger digger (talk) 23:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Woodwind, like Jenuk's idea. -- Abce2 | Access  Denied  23:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.