Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longkam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Empire AS    Talk ! 18:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Longkam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Under WP:NEXIST, I don't believe this article satisfies notability requirements; the only sources I've been able to find are either maps or weather information, which combined do not qualify as "significant coverage". Halfadaniel (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  23:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  23:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Generally populated settlements have been considered de facto notable, because one core part of Wikipedia's remit is to function as a gazetteer. Googling for sources where the language uses a non-Roman script doesn't always work well. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:NGEO "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." I believe this criteria is met, and do no believe any one is questioning that this is a "Populated, legally recognized place" Jeepday (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.