Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longmeng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, and update article. I think all computer companies should make pillows, BTW. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Longmeng

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources after 2006 and the so-called manufacturer's website now links to a pillow sheet manufacturer. Shii (tock) 15:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep as notability is not temporary and Chinese sources go to the end of 2006 in contrast to English sources which stopped after a few days . Better yet refactor into an article about the manufacturer, who are clearly notable . Also I don't see why the nominator is surprised that the website now shows them purely as a pillow manufacturer; the International Herald Tribune article  about the computer specifically mentions that Menglan were "a Chinese company that invests in textiles and information technology". I guess they gave up on the IT bit and decided to get back to their core competency, which in itself suggests an interesting story here. cab (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep There are plenty of information about this chipset & its developer. 1, 2. Since 2008, there has been a vacuum on updates about the product, not to mention that English updates are almost non-existence. 3 I was, however, able to find some Chinese updates under Baidu News. 4. TheAsianGURU (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

http://www.lemote.com/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.21.53 (talk) 06:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.