Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Look Up!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Look Up!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Zero in-depth coverage about this term. Seems to be a bit of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Especially since a significant portion of the piece is unsourced. Currently, over half of the references do not even mention the term. Of the remaining, none talk about it in-depth. Moved to draft in the hopes of improvement, but was contested without improvement. Fails WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 01:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Looked through the cited sources. None of them mention the term 'Look Up!' as it's talked about in the article. The sources are being stretched into something they never remotely mentioned. It's way more than just a bit of synth. ◇  Helen   Degenerate  ◆ 02:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 11:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.