Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Swifties. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

2 weeks old opinionpiece, fails WP:NSUSTAINED by definition. Not good per WP:EVENTCRIT either, though perhaps WP:NBOOK can be seen as more relevant. Redirect/Merge to Gaylor Swifties. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians,  and Women. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Sexuality and gender, United States of America,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You probably meant to suggest Swifties as the redirect target. Jfire (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Correct and thanks. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per rationale in nomination. Way too soon to determine if this is a notable work of journalism and no reason to think it’s inevitable. 108.41.198.35 (talk) 00:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge per nom. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 09:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to Swifties. This is a technical vote just to help build consensus, and a merge is not entirely necessary because the NYT article is already mentioned there sufficiently. The nominator and previous voters have argued correctly and I agree, especially per WP:EVENTCRIT. Meanwhile, look at what Swiftyism has become: obsessive articles criticizing obsessive journalists reporting on obsessive fans. Keep us out of it. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect/Merge to Swifties, although I think the scholarship from the page should remain and be expanded. In the coming years I expect there will be more academic scholarship on the Gaylor community that more firmly delineates it as a conspiracy theory separate from the Swiftie community but I don't think we are there just yet. It took quite some time for Larrie scholarship to start appearing after the buzz from it had died down. Computer-ergonomics (he/him; talk; please ping me in replies ) 15:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Swifties as a WP:SUSTAINED fail. I think the coverage there is satisfactory to the point that a merge isn't really necessary. All the best, Schminnte &#91;talk to me&#93; 16:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Swifties as per comments above.  ℛonherry  ☘  21:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above; merging is not necessary. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect per DOOMSDAYER520.  dxneo  (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.