Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lookeen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Lookeen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. Outside of the solitary review in PCWorld (reminder: "However, the mere existence of reviews does not mean the software is notable. Reviews must be significant, from a reliable source, and/or assert notability"), all coverage seems fringe, promotional or self-published. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Article updated as it was not written about the latest version after I found several blogposts and reviews on relevant blogs and website about this software Peteroe (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  05:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted because several references have been added, e.g. reviews from two of the most important desktop search blogs in the web (arnoldit.com und brianmadden.com Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peteroe (talk)Peteroe 13:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage seems insufficient - this program does not seem to have any larger significance.-- Elmidae (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.