Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looky Looky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the two keep votes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Looky Looky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, undefined notability, unprecise text (gold disc - where?). No such page in Italian Wikipedia. Xx236 (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect - to Giorgio Moroder, song does not have enough notability to justify it's own entry, the Moroder article basically has the same content about this song, the text is accurate for gold disc, and I added sources to verify the content since it was unsourced.-- Isaidnoway (talk)  18:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is now better sourced and it explains that the work is both important to Moroder's career as well as distinct in sound from the rest of his works. --Bensin (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment (I already voted above): The article meets at least two criteria in Notability_(music): a) "The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart." (Yes, it charted in at least three countries.) b) "The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country." (Yes, it was awarded a gold disc). --Bensin (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.