Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loon News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. m.o.p 18:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Loon News

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note The nominator created the AfD discussion at the article talk page, I moved it here to complete the nomination. Monty  845  19:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article seems like the subject should be notable, but as the nomination points out, the article is unsourced, and my attempts to find some to at least establish notability have not succeeded. Monty  845  19:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable. The article may or may not be factually accurate, and the paper may or may not have a strong cult following, but the simple fact is that there is no evidence the Loon News has ever received significant coverage in reliable sources.  - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.