Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loop amplification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A redirect can be editorially created.  Sandstein  04:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Loop amplification

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO; the only use of it in the context of a psychological theory is in just one of the references given, and that reference is a self-published essay on an open access site with no indication of formal peer-review; no mention of this usage in any WP:Reliable sources online. Proposed deletion contested without comment by page creator. Scopecreep (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 08:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Audio induction loop, the most common meaning of the term "loop amplification", with a hatnote:
 * --Lambiam 23:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete The phenomenon being described here is just positive feedback, and the sources are obviously not sufficient for notability. lws (talk) 06:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.