Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loopthing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Loopthing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet notability requirements per WP:WEB; only has blog sources and a press release. Couldn't find any reliable sources to assert notability. News searches, etc, have only found press release and other self-references. I'm not certain that it might be considered to make a "credible claim of significance or importance", hence not speedy.  Chzz  ►  23:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - coverage in reliable sources are lacking. There's blogs and press releases but this short mention is the only thing that seems to qualify as a reliable source and independent of the site. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty much per nom - doesn't appear to hit the notability mark and my searches (incl. Yahoo Ireland for e.g.) have not turned up sources of the necessary independence and reliablity either: the link from Whpq (above) basically being no more than press-release-rehash local media filler. Plutonium27 (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As original PROD'er. A beta site with 4 employees does not usually make for a notable website and I can't find evidence that this would be an exception. TN X Man  02:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Updated - I have added two new reference links(references 10 and 11) to the page which are independant, and which I feel are notable sources as both are well established sites with their own respective audiences.{Donagh mc (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)}
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.