Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loose Change (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Loose Change (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article has had multiple issues tagged for some time, including a request for reliable sources to indicate notability, but no-one has come forward. A google search for "loose change band" returns hits related to several bands, none of whom are the band listed on this page. Perhaps it is best to silently drop it. Ritchie333 (talk) 11:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete:Lacking significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage for this band, only trivial mentions (e.g. ); does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 23:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Legit band of the 1990s American punk revival. Trivial mention in books above is good enough for me. Carrite (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage from independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.